Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20

Getting started with Mercurial for a small team–Branching

This is the seventh post in this series. In the third post we discussed the various branching scenarios and some ideas as to when to branch. We settled on branch as needed approach as our default work process but now we are going to show how to branch when you decide you need to.

When should I branch?

With Mercurial and Git this isn’t nearly as painful as non-dvcs systems and can be /encouraged to be used more often now.

Here’s my choices of when to branch.

1. When a feature / bug fix is big enough (subjective).

This makes it easier to clean up if you decide the code is getting too unwieldy or you can't seem to get it working.

2. When you may need to work on a feature that could take some time to develop.

This makes sure that if something needs to be done in default without your changes than they could be done. Think, hotfix or a quick update.

3. When you know there may be other work going on with code that you will be working on as well.

This allows them to work on the code without you or them worrying about your work. Worry is not exactly the best choice. You will have to worry about it when you need to merge.

4. When you need to ensure the work you are doing does not effect the default line in anyway until you are absolutely ready.

5. If you are really unsure of your work ahead or you want to try/spike some code that you may not keep.

You can get rid of a branch but you might also want to consider doing the Branch with a Clone method.

What is shown below is the named branch scenario. This article on task based development does a nice job of describing the commands for named branching.

Named branch scenario

First, as usual we'll check the state of our repo with hg stat and clean up anything we need to.

Create the branch by typing hg branch "BranchName".

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
HG_InitialBranching


After creating the branch, run hg branches to list out the branches that are currently open. Interesting,
our branch doesn't show up? That's because it hasn't been committed yet. Commit it.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
HG_InitialBranching2

Now run hg branches again and it will show:

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
HG_InitialBranching3

To see what branch you are currently in run hg branch:

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
HG_InitialBranching4

Now that you are in the correct branch you can develop as usual. Committing as you go until you are satisfied you are ready to close the branch and merge it back in to the main branch/line (default).

The repo remembers what branch you are in between sessions but it's always a good idea to check what branch you are in by running hg branch before working just like it is running hg stat to ensure everything is the way you expected it.

Closing the loop

After you have completed all your work on this branch, you’ll need to close out the branch.

Always check your status and what branch your in:

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
hg_checkYourStatus

Now close out the branch by committing it with the --close-branch option. Type hg commit --close-branch '-m "Your message".
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
hg_closeBranch

If you were to run hg branches (lists all active branches) now, you’ll see your branch is gone. If you type hg branch again though you might be a bit confused. It still shows your in the branch you just closed?

You need to move back into the default / main branch with the hg update command.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
hg_closedBranchMove

Now running hg branch will show you in the right branch.

Your almost done. You’ve closed the branch and move back into default but if you were to look at default you won’t find your code from your closed branch. That’s because you haven’t brought in your work from it. We’ll do this now with the hg merge "Branch name to merge" command.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
hg_mergeBranch


The merge command will give you statistics for the merge. As with other steps you need to commit the merge to finalize it. The merge even warns you to not forget to commit.

If you look at the repository in the Hg Workbench (Tortoise) you'll see graphically the branch & merge.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
hg_branch_workbench


You can use the hg glog extension to visualize this at the command line as well.

Review
The basic workflow of working on a named branch:
  1. hg stat
  2. hg branch "BranchName"
    1. hg branches - now will not show your new branch as it hasn't been commited yet.
  3. hg commit -m "Initial commit for branch"
    1. hg branches - now shows your branch.
  4. hg branch - confirm you are in your new branch.
  5. Work as normal. Committing as you need/desire.
  6. hg commit --close-branch -m "Finished Branch"
    1. hg branches - won't show your branch in the list
    2. hg branch - still show you are in the branch
  7. hg update default - go back
  8. hg merge "Branch Name To Merge"
  9. hg commit -m "Commit Message"

It can get more complicated than this but for a small team or one person operation this will be the majority.

Switching branches

In case you need to switch around and work in other branches, run hg update "branch name" to move between branches.

Updating branch with new code from default

The second most common scenario even for a small team is needing to update a branch with code from another branch.

Let's say you have been working on a new feature for quite some time on a branch. In the middle of this a nasty bug is found in the currently live system.

You can't fix it in the branch you are on as it's not ready. What do you do? Switch to the main line/default branch and fix the bug. Deploy the update and everyone's happy.

In this case, you could just keep developing and merge as usual when you are ready BUT let's say for this situation you want to bring in the fix from main to your branch to make sure everything will continue to work fine and if not, fix it now instead of later.

In your branch run:

  1. hg incoming - tells you if you will get anything from the main repository.*
  2. If you have anything incoming then run hg pull. *
  3. hg merge
  4. hg commit -m "Merge in from default"

* - In a one man team operation this is likely not needed since your local repo is highly likely up to date. However, for safety and for a small team your teammates will have to pull. Pulling won't hurt you if there isn't anything to get so it's a good habit to at least check.

The setting up for a team tutorial and task based development have good examples of working with others to get their changes.

Next we'll wrap up with tagging and further reading.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20

Trending Articles